What the Room Said: Five Things We Learned at the Independent Sponsors Summit in Dallas

No video selected

Select a video type in the sidebar.

[Published on June 26th 2026]

The Independent Sponsors Summit came to Dallas on June 11th. Four panels. A full room. And a set of conversations that kept circling back to the same ideas from different angles.

Here's what the day actually said.

 


1. In Texas, you date before you hook up.

Brien Davis has been on both sides of this market. Born in Dallas, he spent years as an independent sponsor before joining Fidus Capital to lead their IS investing. When Cameron Scales asked him what makes Texas different from every other deal market, he didn't reach for a statistic.

"We come from a market where we like to date before we hook up. We want to have a conversation about what you're made of before you do a deal. And I think that's stayed that way despite the fact that it's grown."

The panel, which also included Zak Everson of Baker Tilly and Payton Schramm of Genesis Park, backed it up with a real example: a South Texas business where multiple PE firms came in to management meetings without doing basic homework on the owners. The CEO's wife walked out of the third one. The company is now on investment bank number two.

Rick Lopez of Blackford Capital, joining us from Chicago via the sourcing panel later in the day, said he came in with a prior bias toward energy and real estate, and had to recalibrate: "It's become clear it's much more than that. It's a much more robust business community than I originally anticipated or appreciated."

The lesson isn't that Texas is uniquely difficult. It's that sponsors who treat it like any other market who show up knowing the SIM but not the seller, are starting every conversation behind.

2.  The numbers are the last thing capital providers want to hear. 

Andy Foskey has done around 50 to 60 independent sponsor deals since Transition Capital Partners was founded in 1993. Claudine Cohen of CohnReznick moderated the keynote session and asked him what institutional capital actually wants to hear when a sponsor walks in.

His answer: not the numbers.

"Before they even want to hear anything about the numbers, institutional equity providers are very focused on the set up to the deal. Who's the sponsor? What's their track record? Why do they deserve to have capital applied to own and control this asset? Do they have an angle? You have to answer that series of questions first. Because if you go to the numbers first, they're not listening."

The reason is structural. Every institutional LP backing an independent sponsor is operating in a double promote arrangement. There has to be a clear answer to why that's justified — why this sponsor, for this asset, at this moment. If you can't make that case before you open the model, the model won't close the gap.

Andy's co-panelist Nick Barnard of Switchback Capital, two years in, operator background, non traditional PE track record, offered the version of this that applies when you're starting out: "The story is about us. The equity sources that have backed us have been family offices we've known. They really are betting on us."

Two different stages, the same core principle. Before the numbers, there has to be a story that holds up on its own.

3.  The numbers are the last thing capital providers want to hear. 

Cody Church ran five private equity funds before retiring and switching sides, backing independent sponsors with his own capital through Clear North Capital. The shift in perspective was on full display in Thomas Kesoglou's panel on what LPs actually expect.

On the timing of the capital conversation: "So many independent sponsors just get the deal and then try to go find the money. I'd rather have them come and talk to me ahead of time, show me some stuff, talk to me and get to know me, because it's really hard to make a decision quickly if you've never met somebody."

Bill Floyd of Merit Capital, who has been investing alongside independent sponsors since 2012, put the same point in different terms from the LP side: "If you're bringing us in 30 days post-LOI with a full diligence sprint already underway, we're automatically going to opt out."

But the more nuanced version of this theme wasn't about timing, it was about honesty when things go wrong. Cody coined a phrase that landed in the room: "timely truth-telling." The concept is simple; the execution is hard.

"That concept of timely truth-telling is different in every single person. I've had to sit with my partners and say, you're a month late on this. I should have known about this within days."

He illustrated the stakes with a real scenario from his portfolio, a plane going down in one of his air charter investments. "That timely truth-telling is: you call me now. I do not want to learn that we had a plane go down on Instagram."

Bill's version of the same principle, aimed at sponsors who worry about being a burden: "Good news travels fast, bad news travels faster. It's okay to say, I don't know the answer yet. You're not being a burden. We'll work through it together."

4.  The sourcing edge is a thesis, not a channel.

John Arnold of Celarity moderated the sourcing panel with Chandra Kaza of Monroe Capital, Rick Lopez of Blackford Capital, and Kevin Sample of Opus Capital Partners. Monroe sees 600 to 700 deals a year. Around 15 to 20% now come from Texas.

Chandra's point on what separates a good sourcing story from a weak one: "The sourcing story starts before you even have the deal. Knowing that this deal is right in the heart of what you're after, that's really attractive. What's really tough for us is when we're deep in a process and we've already seen it from private equity firms who are bidding on it and we know what their bids are."

Kevin Sample, whose sourcing model at Opus is built around operators, find the right one, follow them into their industry, mine their network, gave the most direct warning of the session:

"Sponsors get very excited about getting a deal. They'll go to a broker and give a crazy bid on it. Next thing you know, you win the deal and then you've got to go to the capital provider trying to convince them this is a good deal, but they already know you're overpaying. So now you're already committed and that's a bad situation."

For sponsors starting from scratch in Texas, Kevin's 90-day prescription: spend time with the IS community in Dallas-Fort Worth, map the broker and banker ecosystem carefully, align with industries you actually know, and stay out of auctions. "Find brokers working on deals trying to find the right buyer."

On AI in the sourcing process, the panel drew a clear line. AI is genuinely useful for screening targets, building lists, and mining networks for exit signals. But Rick Lopez put the limit plainly: "Talking to a founder, talking to the seller, talking to the executive, there's no AI replacement for that yet. Building that relationship is something the best sponsors continue to do."

5.  Be authentic. No BS.

A thread ran through the entire day that didn't belong to any single panel.

Payton Schramm of Genesis Park said sloppy materials are an immediate deal killer "you can have the best deal in the world, but if it's not presented well, it's usually an immediate deal killer" but also that a really polished deck can paper over a bad deal long enough to get capital committed to something that shouldn't be.

Brien Davis said that excess hubris about a deal, not understanding the full risk profile, being overly cocky in the meeting, will kill a partnership regardless of the numbers: "It doesn't matter what the numbers look like at that point."

Cody Church said Pollyanna hockey stick projections are a trust problem from the first slide: "I would much rather have someone show me that we might actually have a down year because this is an industry that has some cyclicality."

And from the audience Q&A on the Texas panel, Zak Everson observed that AI is now generating a circular reference problem in deal materials, SIMs diligenced by AI, questions answered by AI, back and forth, that is making authenticity harder to signal and easier to fake.

Cameron Scales's closing line to the room was the right one to end the day on: "Be authentic. No BS. Tell your story. An air of superiority doesn't go over well."

The market knows the difference.

 


The Independent Sponsors Summit returns to New York on September 28-29 and LA on December 1-2, 2026.  Stay tuned for what's next.

iGlobal Forum




 

About the Author
Hannah Dolan, Head of Production, iGlobal Forum

Related Blog Articles

What the Room Said: Five Things We Learned at the Independent Sponsors Summit in Dallas

The Independent Sponsors Summit came to Dallas on June 11th. Four panels. A full room. And a set of conversations t...
Read More

Pre-LOI Diligence That Prevents Re-Trades: What Independent Sponsors Must Verify Before Naming a Price

As an independent sponsor in the lower middle market, you're often sourcing off-market or lightly intermediated dea...
Read More

Exclusive Interview: Payton Schramm, Director at Genesis Park

The independent sponsor market continues to attract stronger talent and deeper pools of capital - but according to ...
Read More

Where Do I Start with AI for My Specific Company?

A Strategic Framework for Independent Sponsors Navigating AI Implementation in Portfolio Companies The question com...
Read More

We connect people better through our Brand Promise:

At iGlobal Forum we deliver tangible and measurable outcomes that directly contribute to the success and growth of clients. With our commitment to excellence backed by our Risk-Free policy, we guarantee your satisfaction.

Copyright @2023. iGlobalForum.com All right reserved

Our Location

134 N 4th Street,

Brooklyn,

New York, NY 11249

Tel: (212) 752-7760

info@iglobalforum.com