Power Players in Real Estate Lending: Where Do Capital Providers Want to Be?

[Published on June 15th 2023]

Real estate lending is a dynamic industry that plays a crucial role in the development and maintenance of the built environment. Capital providers, including banks, non-bank lenders, and other institutional investors, are key players in this industry, shaping lending availability and terms. As the real estate market continues to evolve, it is essential to understand the factors that influence these players' decisions and the implications for borrowers and investors.

In this blog post, we will explore some of the most pressing questions related to real estate lending and the power players in the industry:

What criteria are LPs considering when evaluating investments, including returns, time horizons, and agreement terms?

Understanding changing loan structures: senior loans, mezzanine financing, preferred equity, bridge loans, C-PACE, credit lease, private placement debt, sale-leaseback, and ground lease – how do they fit into today’s capital stack?

Over the course of this blog post, we will explore these questions in more detail and provide insights into the complex world of real estate lending. Whether you are a borrower or an investor, understanding the power players in this industry is essential for success.

How will lending availability and terms change as the real estate market moves forward?

Lending availability and terms are influenced by a variety of factors, including the economic climate, regulatory environment, and market trends. As the real estate market continues to evolve, lenders may adjust their lending criteria and terms to reflect changes in these factors.

For example, during periods of economic growth, lenders may be more willing to lend to riskier borrowers or offer more flexible terms. Conversely, during economic downturns or market volatility, lenders may tighten lending criteria and require more conservative terms. Additionally, regulatory changes or shifts in market trends can also influence lending availability and terms.

How does interest rate volatility drive loan structuring (i.e. issues of hedging, cap costs, etc.)?

Interest rate volatility can significantly impact loan structuring, particularly regarding issues of hedging and cap costs. When interest rates are volatile, lenders may require borrowers to hedge their exposure to interest rate risk or pay a higher interest rate to compensate for the risk.

For example, a borrower may use an interest rate swap to hedge against the risk of rising interest rates. Additionally, cap costs, which are fees charged by lenders to limit the maximum interest rate on a loan, may increase during periods of interest rate volatility.

Non-bank lenders vs. banks: What are the main risks?

Non-bank lenders and banks have different risk profiles, business models, and regulatory environments. The main risks associated with non-bank lenders include credit risk, liquidity risk, and operational risk. Non-bank lenders may have less robust risk management and governance frameworks than banks, which can increase the likelihood of these risks.

The main risks associated with banks include credit risk, liquidity risk, and systemic risk. Banks may be subject to more stringent regulatory requirements and oversight than non-bank lenders, which can mitigate these risks.

Bridging the gap: How are deals getting done in a difficult debt market?

In a difficult debt market, deals may be challenging to finance, and borrowers may need to explore alternative financing options. Alternative financing options include private placement debt, sale-leaseback, and ground lease. These options may offer more flexible terms or lower costs than traditional bank financing. Additionally, borrowers may need to work with multiple lenders or investors to secure financing for a deal.

What are some effective strategies to secure loan assumptions in the process of acquiring assets?

Loan assumptions can be an effective way to secure financing when acquiring assets. To secure loan assumptions, borrowers must meet the criteria lenders use to evaluate loan assumptions, which may include creditworthiness, property value, and financial stability. Additionally, borrowers may need to negotiate with the lender to ensure that the terms of the assumption are favorable.

Non-performing loans (NPLs) and Discounted Payoffs (DPOs) – how to access the deals and the capital to execute?

Accessing NPLs and DPOs requires expertise and resources. To access these deals and the capital to execute, borrowers may need to work with specialized lenders or investors with experience in distressed debt. These lenders or investors may have specific criteria for evaluating distressed assets and may require borrowers to provide detailed financial information and a clear strategy for executing the deal.

Should investors interested in debt and distress consider NPL strategies?

Investors interested in debt and distress may consider NPL strategies. NPLs can offer opportunities to acquire distressed assets at a discount, which may provide higher returns than traditional real estate investments. However, NPL strategies also carry risks, including credit risk, market risk, and operational risk. Investors should carefully evaluate these risks and the potential rewards before investing in NPLs.

What are some key trends in the use of rescue capital?

Rescue capital is a form of capital that is provided to distressed assets to facilitate their recovery. Key trends in the use of rescue capital include an increasing focus on sustainability and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, as well as the use of technology to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of rescue capital deployment.

How are material and labor shortages being factored into lending decisions?

Material and labor shortages are significant challenges for the real estate industry. Lenders may factor these shortages into their lending decisions by requiring borrowers to provide more detailed information on construction timelines, budgets, and supply chain management. Lenders may also require borrowers to provide contingency plans in case of delays or cost overruns.

What are the preferred markets and assets for capital providers in real estate lending?

Preferred markets and assets for capital providers in real estate lending vary depending on the lender's risk appetite, investment strategy, and market conditions. In general, capital providers may prefer markets with strong economic fundamentals, such as job growth, population growth, and affordability. Preferred assets may include multifamily, industrial, and office properties, as well as assets that have long-term lease agreements or stable cash flows.

What criteria are LPs considering when evaluating investments, including returns, time horizons, and agreement terms?

Limited partners (LPs) are institutional investors who invest in real estate funds managed by general partners (GPs). When evaluating investments, LPs consider a range of criteria, including expected returns, time horizons, and agreement terms. LPs may have specific investment mandates or preferences, such as a focus on sustainable investments or a preference for a particular asset class or geographic region. Additionally, LPs may evaluate the GP's track record, investment strategy, and alignment of interests with LPs.

Understanding changing loan structures: senior loans, mezzanine financing, preferred equity, bridge loans, C-PACE, credit lease, private placement debt, sale-leaseback, and ground lease – how do they fit into today’s capital stack?

Real estate lenders offer a range of loan structures to meet borrowers' financing needs. These loan structures include senior loans, mezzanine financing, preferred equity, bridge loans, C-PACE, credit lease, private placement debt, sale-leaseback, and ground lease. Each of these loan structures fits into today's capital stack in a different way, depending on the borrower's financing needs, the lender's risk appetite, and the market conditions. For example, senior loans are typically lower risk and lower return than mezzanine financing, which is a higher risk and higher return loan structure.

Conclusion:

Real estate lending is a complex and dynamic industry that is influenced by a range of factors, including market trends, regulatory environment, and investor criteria. Understanding the power players in this industry, including capital providers, is essential for borrowers and investors seeking to navigate this industry successfully. By considering the questions and answers explored in this blog post, stakeholders in the real estate lending industry can gain valuable insights into the factors that shape lending availability, terms, and structures.

Register now to join the discussion

About the Author
Melissa Smith, Content Developer at iGlobal Forum

Related Blog Articles

Market Poised for Rebound Despite Uncertainty: Takeaways from the 25th Real Estate Private Equity Summit

Several of the speakers at the recent Real Estate In Private Equity Summit, presented in late-March by iGlobal Foru...
Read More

Unlocking European Capital: A Guide for U.S. Fund Managers

iGlobal Forum sat down with Dewi Habraken, Senior Director - Business Development, JTC and Jevgeniy Nesch, Investme...
Read More

Q&A Spotlight: Silvia Lupu/Jevan Capital - 25th Real Estate Private Equity Summit

As the CRE space continues to transform, a crucial question regarding the evolution of its financing landscape with...
Read More

Jacobs Law Helps CRE Companies Navigate Any Legal Challenge In Complex Times

At a time of financial hardship and uncertainty throughout the industry, commercial real estate companies need a fi...
Read More

Copyright @2023. iGlobalForum.com All right reserved

Our Location

6 East 43rd St
19th Floor
New York, NY 10017

Tel: (212) 752-7760

info@iglobalforum.com